9 February 2022

3 minute read

Several scientists are exploring the various aspects of raising cattle with the overarching goals of quantifying greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and identifying ways to reduce them.

One study, conducted at USask’s Livestock and Forage Centre of Excellence’s (LFCE) Termuende Ranch near Lanigan, is heading into its fifth and final year. During the summers, cattle grazed in pastures with two paddocks that included non-bloat legume plants, to determine the effects of these forage types on GHG emissions.

“It’s a circle,” said Dr. Diane Knight (PhD), professor in the Department of Soil Science. “We’re trying to link what cows are eating, how diets influence the soil, how soil influences plants, which then influence cattle as they eat. The whole premise is to close the circle and look at the system rather than individual points in the system.”

Knight is collaborating with Dr. Rich Farrell (PhD) and Dr. Bart Lardner (PhD), all in the College of Agriculture and Bioresources.

Misconceptions about GHG and cattle abound, starting with which end of the cow methane is emitted from. It’s from belching, the by-product of cattle’s ruminant digestive system. As microbes in the animal’s rumen (the first of four stomachs) break down high fibre forages that people are unable to eat, the feed is fermented and the microbes release gas.

Preliminary results show that the cattle grazing on the pasture where cicer milkvetch—a type of legume—had been seeded, produced about 20 per cent less methane than the animals that grazed in the “control” pasture.

“We want to find a pasture type that will produce a good yield and good quality pasture during the grazing season, will result in adequate weight gains on the grazing animals, and will potentially reduce emissions,” explained Lardner, professor in the Department of Animal and Poultry Science.

While bugs or microbes are chewing on the remnants of plants in the rumen, more bugs are chewing on roots in the soil.

“It’s all bug-driven, but it’s not the same bugs in the rumen and the soil. The ones in the rumen emit methane and the ones in the soil emit nitrous oxide, but they are both greenhouse gases. People may think that we have to get rid of nitrous oxide emissions. It’s impossible, but we do need to manage and minimize them,” said Knight.

Another misconception involves manure, which acts like a slow-release fertilizer. It’s the urine, providing water, that triggers the release of GHG, not the manure.

With moisture providing the right conditions, soil microbes break down the forages’ roots and the cattle’s manure and urine, and provide nutrients that feed the plants. While Lardner is looking at legumes potentially reducing methane emissions from cattle, Knight is looking at whether the legumes are causing more or less nitrogen to be emitted from the soil or whether the plants in the pasture are efficiently using it as part of their growth.

This will lead to a complete system number that can be incorporated into Canada’s greenhouse gas inventory, dispelling another misconception.

“We know we are producing low carbon footprint cattle in Western Canada,” said Farrell, associate professor in the Department of Soil Science.

“If we want (climate) models to reflect what’s happening in Western Canada, we need to provide the data so the models can be adjusted to what’s actually occurring here. That’s the knowledge gap that we are trying to fill.”

Part of that gap includes the effect of manure applied to cropland in the semi-arid Prairies. In another study, Farrell and Dr. Jeff Schoenau (PhD) are comparing nitrogen emissions from manure spread at constant or variable rates on barley fields at the LFCE’s Forage Cow-Calf Research and Teaching Unit, near Clavet.